What AchieveCE learners are saying

I found numerous questions where the answers to the questions did not agree with the information in the test.

enjoyed most segments. found the body lifting segment not applicable and outdated. Also found the opioid research segment very frustrating for no good reason.

The course was easy to follow and understand, but I would have preferred a heavier focus on mental health medical errors.

I like the facet that it allowed me to take my time to study at my own pace

The course was very convenient but also very long and time consuming

Would have liked to have images with the oral pathology section, otherwise the course was good.

This course was straightforward and in-line with the started leaning objectives. I liked that it was self-paced and you could go back and forth between pages as much as you need.

Tends to read more like a list of package inserts, but appreciate the info on clinical trials. Case based discussions are always welcome.

I don't like that I had to go through all the modules before getting any CEUs

Medical Errors has been a topic for quite a while, it could be useful to provide more recent data as well as the history

I would like to have seen the answer key to understand why the answers I selected were incorrect.

Some of the material was a little outdated. It was updates from 2021 and it is 2024.

It was a bit tedious. Adding some videos would help. Quizzes could have been done better. I loved the case studies!

Would have liked to have seen information about tick related symptoms of “Alpha Gal”, and hear how treatments can improve symptoms.

I thought all of the material was relevant and efficiently met the objectives. Some of the information in the pandemic course needs to be updated to reflect the most recent information provided by the CDC, NIH, and FDA (such as, vaccines are no longer thought to prevent the spread of Covid-19, the 6 feet rule/social distancing is arbitrary and not supported by science, and general mask-wearing is ineffective in Covid-19 prevention. I believe that there were a couple of incorrect answers to the tests on Empathy (regarding the Jefferson Empathy test), and Safe Patient Handling (regarding unsafe lifting, need to consult the algorithm rather then asking instructor if assistance can be provided). The Management of Acute Stroke In Older Patients appeared to present information targeting the UK. Since I am in the USA, I would need to double check the findings against current information available in my locale. The verbiage used in the Eating Disorder module was strange at times. It seemed to have possibly been AI-generated or translated literally from another language.

This course was very interesting and informative. I would have loved to see pictures of the ticks, bites, and rashes associated.

Seemed to be geared more towards pharmacists, yet said was for APRNS

It would be helpful to have audio along with visual for computer coarse for different types of learners

Covers the subject exhaustively. The citations interfere with the flow of learning. The videos were helpful

Some issues in the second part of the training but good coverage and education overall.

The answer to Question 19 is improperly worded. It should state "LOWEST EFFECTIVE DOSE" not highest!!

Ok. Some interesting subjects. Don't care for the typos though, makes the information seem suspect.

was a whole lot of direction on covid-19 and not much else

The slides were great and informational. The presenter was very distracting and lost focus/thought too much. Said "umm" too much.