What AchieveCE learners are saying

Read like it was AI generated...misspelled words and poorly written sentences. Some of the topics were very general and some were packed with facts no one would be able to remember for the test.

Huge blocks of text to try to remember bits and pieces for the tests.

I don't think it was a geared towards RNs, more towards advanced level practitioners

info needs updated it's 2025. Statistics are probably inaccurate resources may have changed

Too much technical information in a short time for social worker. Course was geared toward pharm profession.

It was more for nurses than for respiratory therapists. I did like the length of the content. It was mostly concise. There are a lot of grammatical errors scattered throughout. The Covid course needs to be updated.

One of the questions on the test I believe has an incorrect answer. It claims maternal sepsis is only an issue in developing countries. That is a dangerous generalization that could cost a woman and/or her unborn baby their lives.

I think that they've improved with giving us some more videos and some more pictures but I think that it would be better if we had some more media because most of this generation is used to being on their phones and not just scrolling and reading and reading is just tiring and loses my attention. I did learn some subjects and some information that I didn't know about that actually made me stop and think wow I didn't know that. But re ading a case study about percentages about telemedicine and how the internet works is really not necessary in this generation we are well equipped to know how Wi-Fi and broadband works. Overall the courses good but I think that you need to separate it into chapters on the main page so we can see at a glance rather than have it on the sidebar.

I was hoping for a variety of learning opportunities and not just all reading

didn't learn anything new, but able to apply being a good person to every situation

Good content and case studies, but would prefer different presentation with more variety and appeal to different learning styles (it is pages of reading).

I would’ve liked a 100 but I did get a little confused at some questions.

Some of the boxes did not check and I only realized it after the test was scored.

The amount of detail on some of the modules was too much

Far too many repetitive generalizations. Can only say so many times that nurses would benefit from more financial education. Could instead include more of said financial education.

not really relevant to a therapist, but I guess makes sense for other LCSWs in hospital or medical setting

Some topics went into to too much depth for my level of expertise because I don't treat these types of medical conditions, such as Parkinson's Disease and Lyme Disease

Much of the material seemed out of the CNA scope of practice and more applicable to nurses but it was doable and it is good info to have.

There is a typo about when licensure was passed for Respiratory Therapists in Florida, it was 1985, not 1975.

Overall sufficient. Very information dense at times. Some typos and grammatical errors that could be improved or corrected.

The course was fine, but it seems unnecessary to be a requirement for RD renewal.

It was fine just not that interesting to me. This is all very familiar as my last year of nursing school was very focused on EBP

Questions were vague and the joint commission required RCA for sentinel events since 1996 not 1997 so update and correct your test and information

It was slightly challenging since I am blind. I lost my sight suddenly 7 years ago while at bedside, working on a patient