What AchieveCE learners are saying

The information in this course was excellent, however, would be better delivered with visual supplements (photos/images/videos)

All reading, no visuals, very informative and exactly what i needed to satisfy my requirements.

I found some of the answers to be incorrect after verifying. Course was easy to navigate and complete.

I feel that there was value to this material but it was often repetitive and too much emphasis on drugs and not as broad based to patient care as I would like. The slides were repetitive from course to course when it was the same speaker. The vaccination course needs to be updated as is 4 years old. The DEI course emphasized not using race or gender in determining treatment pathways but the very next course on ASCVD provided clear guidelines that have been researched and used for years that take into account race, age and gender in determining appropriate treatment guidelines for hyperlipidemia, HTN and ASCVD.

Question #1 if the correct response is all of the above, then that means all of the above statements are NOT true. Your reviewer needed to take a closer look at how the wording is

Too wordy, and not clear I for got a lot of the information.

Information contained herein was interesting. I think that more information should be included on the authors of the subjects covered. Most of the reference material was from more than five years ago, which I thought I had previously learned was not considered up-to-date. Although instantaneous test score results were available, for learning purposes, I think incorrect answers should have been noted and with the correct answer supplied and explained/justified. I think the courses did a good job of listing learning objectives and of discussing them throughout the learning materials.

I thought there would be audio to the course. I did like that I could take it at my own pace.

Not deep enough, or maybe I am already too familiar with the subject—NO new material for me. Looking to learn more, but just was not challenging.

average, what made it most informative were the cases. More of those would be solid and perhaps after examples of ethical. It would instill the material.

It was a good experience other than the fact that it would say that I wasn't present even when I was and it would erase my progress.

Material is over 5 years old and in technology time that is ancient. Still, I was able to pick up a couple good points and would like to study more up to date material on this subject.

It was quite in depth for being a school based physical therapist.

Interesting information, but a bit out of my depth as a counselor.

The information provided felt helpful and straight to the point. I would highly encourage creating an immersive learning experience to balance information.

The course format is simple and quick, but for 40 bucks I expected 0 typos. W/e charge it to the game ig.

too much information to read and try to remember when taking the test. Too many case studies to read through. I would prefer an audible option.

material on opioids is outdated. as well as the requirements for WV license renewal.

This course was mostly reading. While I do enjoy reading, having more videos/other formats to deliver the material would have been helpful in keeping the material more engaging.

Dry, repetitive. Needs to be edited down to about half it's current length. Examples and case studies would greatly improve it's appeal and effectiveness.

felt examples were too slim. There are more points to take into consideration that provided in given situations

Ifind the segment on medication not in thecapacity of CNA SET SKILLS OTHER WISE NEW MATERIAL INFORMATIVE

one of the questions had no correct answer re when the correct answer was the "highest" rather than the lowest

The very long free text format without engagement is not conducive for learning