What AchieveCE learners are saying

I expected a video and more up to date information about using telehealth with clients

Not interactive enough. Just gives a ton of information to read through, and then a quiz after each section.

I don’t know why this is a continuous education for massage therapist license renewal.

The course was good , I would’ve liked if there were tests in the middle of the reading instead of at the end. By that time I had forgotten and had to go back and re-read everything

It was sometimes difficult to engage with the material. Some of the information seemed to be 10 years old and not very updated

I liked the ease, I really liked the reading font. Just update the material.

The information was fine. It would be nice to have data and resources that are up to date.

Some courses were aimed at student nurses, not experienced nurses. Some did not have enough information to answer test questions and I had to look up additional information and got kicked out. Some were UK based which differs from US hospital and terminology.

Was a quick course. Information was provided in an easily consumed and retained model. Would have preferred a verbal training course.

I was hoping to see the studies, logic and discussion for given the vaccines AND antibiotics for simple exposure. if antibiotics have worked before why would we necessarily add these vaccines...which will always occur some side effects. i have to say this appears promotional for such treatment,,,and such is the CDC with their use of pharmaceuticals to make money.

The course information was good, but the post-test was incredibly redundant and did not test over much of the actual information in the course.

It was not for counselors, but for Pharmacists. It would be nice to have this more clear in the description.

some of the questions were based on years, stats, and the names of theorists so it was hard to remember.

I am grateful to be able to learn more about schizophrenia. The citations were 20 years old, so I would like to see what more recent research would add to what was included in this course. The content took a lot less than 3 hours to go through, I'm wondering if I am mistaken that this was a 3 CEUs course. I would have preferred to learn more, go more in-depth, than have a shorter course.

I thought that some of the questions were asking for minute details that were unimportant.

There was a lot of reading and outdated information. If it was more interactive (videos, lectures, etc) it would have been more interesting. Also, some of the information was very outdated and dated older than 10 plus years. It would have been nice to see more current information.

It was fine. Some videos would be nice for better understanding of positions of the patient.

It is hard to focus on the text as it is currently presented.

Many of the photos are of children with Downs Syndrome not Autism.

This course is dry. A video or two or some images would be helpful.

Interesting topic, however poorly written & information is not in-depth. Multiple typos & grammar errors. A question on the test clearly discusses a situation AFTER a disaster episode, but the answer is incorrect as it includes things to do DURING the episode. Also, first it told me I had a 90% on my test (missed one), then 100%...and now it is showing 95%. I hope the creator sees this & will re-structure the information & go a little further in-depth. I did not learn anything new that I would be able to use.

References used in this course are largely outdated (most over ten years old)

it kept refreshing erasing all my answers. I wished it would have saved because I had to restart it at least 3 times

On slide 15, under Noninvasive nonpharmacologic approaches to acute pain, the fist paragraph is gibberish in Latin. Would recommend removal.