What AchieveCE learners are saying

it seems that the time required to complete reading material doesn't give proper or equal credit time .

It was very lengthy with read only mode. No differentiated learning to maintain the learner's attention.

Very difficult and most nurses will never encounter most of these issues.

experience technical difficulty. All my answers were deleted and I had to start again.

The MATERIAL IS MODERATE. IT WAS HELPING FOR THE REVIEW. i WAS EXPEXTING THE COURSE TO HAVE MORE INFORMATION ABOUT Medical EROR PROVIDE SOME EXAMPLES SOLID EXAMPLE LIKE A FACT THAT HAPPEND COUSED MEDICAL ERRORS.

It is outdated, and also has wrong key on an answer. Question: Which of the following is an example of an inappropriate medical documentation practice? Your Answer: Charting patient care at the time that it is provided. The correct answer should be: Criticizing the actions of a colleague Or your wording was really bad for saying, "Charting patient care at the time that it is provided" (you meant before that task done?)

The information can be challenging with no graphs or key vocabulary of key details.

This is my first time doing these on my own. I have always done them working at a facility, I am not a fan of all of the reading. The facility I worked at had videos that were much easier to follow than all of this reading.

There was commercial bias in this course with an emphasis on new drugs

It was a bit boring with just text, a little confusing with other state's information, and I needed the case studies to answer the questions instead of relying on my memory from reading them.

1) I expected a pre-recorded presentation. 2) I expected more discussion of HOW to implement appropriate telehealth services. 3) I DO appreciate the ease of completing my "technology-assisted services" requirement.

I did not like that the individual courses could not be separated out from the purchased bundle. The Pharmacy-level course was very technical for a general healthcare overview of marijuana/THC. The podcast was technical, fast, and the presenter’s style was distracting.

More discussion on contraindications, mgmt of adverse effects, transitioning from 1 method to another --- all as another course --- keep the issues for pharmacists as a separate offering.

strongly disliked the large test at the end versus breaking it up. Some very specific questions after a lot of material is a bit difficult to handle

The text was dry and formatting could look better on the eyes.

The course was really great and interesting! However, I had to complete the test three times because each time I submitted, it said the session timed out. VERY FRUSTRATING!!!

IT would be nice to be able to enlarge the charts in order to read them easier

fix mispellings and connect questions to content preceeding the questions more clearly

Although this course had the complete credits to satisfy the Florida nursing license, I think we should’ve been able to pick and choose the classes that we needed and not have the credits bound together.

There is a question about halfway through that is incorrectly labeled. I picked the correct answer and it showed as such but when I picked B which it was easy correct it said wrong even though the description said it was right and said A was right but it is not

Multiple fixable issues with this course from answers to questions being duplicated to the tests being graded wrong. It was a convenient way to get my necessary CE's and I will continue to use this in the future but improvements could definitely be made. Thank you

Please develop recommendations based on comparison of which medication has increased risk of side effect in which patients. I the medications all have the same side effects that is also important.

It is a read only course, so it was easy to take.

It was very frustrating that I paid the $40 and couldn't access only the courses I needed. I will probably go elsewhere next time.