What AchieveCE learners are saying

I liked the course but been that was about oral lesions, I would have liked to see pictures

Good, but sometimes the audio did not match up with the text

Excellent content but I found your test questions time consuming and annoying...I do not want to remember what it is not; but, directly what I need to know that will make my practices better.

Very heavy on highly specific drug chemistry which is beyond the scope for many medical providers such as physical therapists.

Some answers I gave that were correct from the text I read were not counted correct after the test.

Woo Hoo I passed and I'm good to go for the next two years. This next time I will do one a month instead of all at once.

Really helpful and comprehensive CE package. My only real issue is the occasional use of Florida-specific laws and regulations despite this being sold as a package for Ohio Social Workers.

Over all, pretty good. I did not like the section on estheticians

The last unit on sedation relates far more to a dentist's needs or use, rather than a dental hygienist. Other wise, great courses.

There were a few questions and answers that didnt make sense or line up but overall it was lengthy but extremely easy to use.

Noticed one of the question #9 on last subject Impairment I think I answered right, and it gave me as wrong answer. The question was " YOU SHOULD ALWAYS APPROACH AN IMPAIRED NURSE BY YOURSELF" and my answer was FALSE which I agreed I should not...always communicate to supervisor. Also, many grammar mistakes through the course.

One question was incomplete. And there were questions on a passage that was not included in the text.

The course was good- but some ethics questions based on the State of Florida do not apply to other States- it is not important for someone outside of the State of Florida to know their laws. Also autism is more prevalent than listed based on current data.

Some parts were very elementary and had very little depth. An example is the section on hypertension. That is just basics and really a nurse should already know much more than what is presented and at a much greater depth.

Optimized for mobile phone. Loved the format. Was able to work at my own pace.

It satisfied my state requirement in this field. In that regard, I am satisfied

The course was fine, even though most of the statistics were from 2003 or earlier. There was just no clear link of application to massage therapy, so I was unsure why it, specifically, was required. Seemed like, absent of a clearer application of how I am supposed to apply this info to my specific career, there are only about a million more relevant and applicable topics I could be required to study.

High value CME activity at a low-cost! I highly recommend this learning activity to other healthcare providers.

Pictures would have been nice to go along with the anatomy discussion.

Proof reading articles would be helpful. Misspellings and duplicated answer selections in exams.

This course covers a lot information, and it does a good job. Thanks!

Some of the subject matters were interesting, while others were a bit lengthy and dense. Overall, it was an ok course, but most importantly it complied with my licensure requirements.

The only thing I noticed is I got an answer on the pre test wrong, and then on the post test, I answered it as the computer had answered it previously and got it wrong. This was on the question on why employers should support pro dev. I first answered "all of the above", which I believe to be correct, but in pre test, it was marked wrong, just an FYI, thanks.

Very convoluted. Hard to understand the different charting methods by reading this.Need more examples of what each charting style looks like.