What AchieveCE learners are saying

Need to remove redundancy in some of the articles. Also the fellow giving the talk about addiction did a good job but his introduction and gloating about himself was too much.

The answers weren't in the reading material all of them stated like on the test.

Had trouble with marking my answer choices. Obvious errors, but not what I thought I marked.

I wish I had a chance to go back on some of the information I could have gotta the 3 I missed correct. But this was great information I wish I could have saved it and got back to it because my kids needing me to do things for them .

Would enjoy an outline of the terms and acronyms because I have difficulty processing loads of information

I enjoyed the course, and did learn from it, however, I thought many of the questions on each quiz did not imply to some of the most informative, important, or useful information on the course material.

The course contained a lot of information and was well-structured. I suggest it be reviewed for typos, as some of them made the content confusing.

The course was fine. It is still heavily focused on covid 19.

really enjoyed it - did wish it came in an all inclusive packet of sorts and smaller font so it was easier to look through - hate having to go to a previous page to find something I know was covered but forgot and wanted to verify/clarify - by the time I got to the page I forgot was i was looking for - 1 single document would be amazing!

The material is good, but the questions at end are poorly written and in one case seems to have no right answers (probably typo?).

I wish It was easier to check your answers than have to go back searching.

simplify the wording of questions a little or possibly reference where they are in the source material like what chapter or page or something please

Some topics were very boring or not so helpful in the acute clinical settings

question 19 has NO correct answer. It should state limit the opioid dose to the LOWEST effective dose.

Some of the question were not worded clearly which made it difficult to understand exactly what was being asked.

TONS of pharmacology, way more than needed for RN CEs, but appreciate the hefty load to increase my knowledge. Wouldn't recommend for someone not interested in most modules being pharm.

The course was good- some questions were extremely pharm heavy that felt more appropriate for a pharmacist instead of an RN. But very educational.

I would have rated this course as 5 stars but the Canabis Conundrum Webcast was the absolute worst compared to the other courses in the bundle. Although the speaker was extremely knowledgeable about the subject, the presentation was presented monotone, highly scientific and technical and it was difficult to take the test because it was hard to follow him, so I had to keep reviewing the material. I recommend another presenter or removing this presentation

I look forward to continuing to look for more education. Thanks so much. Time to renew my license.

Found the content overall informative and engaging. Would have preferred a video/ audio demonstration of some of the material to supplement the readings.

The course provided a good overview about ASD. I would like to see more in depth information on interventions that mental health professionals can utilize when individuals with ASD are present in session

Only took it because it was required. I do not work in an area where I prescibe narcotics regularly and do not treat substance abuse disorders.

Just FYI, there are some errors in some of the test questions & answers. See # 2, # 3, # 15, & #16. Case studies are misidentified in some of the questions. Good course over all. Interesting! Thanks!

it was cool but it would be nice nice to learn to about somthing other than covid 19