What AchieveCE learners are saying

Question 11 scenario did not have any information that would have suspected illegal activity. Unless it was the prescription itself. It might need some additional info.

It was relevant to so many events that have occurred in the states lately

This course was good at providing relevant factors. I especially appreciated the list of points to add to a treatment plan. It gave me so much to think about that I found my thoughts interfered with being able to select the correct answer on the post-test. However, I took lots of notes and will incorporate the list of interventions in my work with hoarders.

Way too much information to take in at one time but extremely informative.

Not bad material, but generally not targeted to medical physicists in particular

Some of the tutorials gave a lot of unneeded facts, some of the questions were poorly written and confusing

Could use a video or two to switch it up but over all easy read and quick course!

Quick and easy way to get all the CE credits needed for license renewal.

i would like for an explanation on why an answer was wrong or right on the test and self assessment

Not a bad course. It would be more beneficial to give the answers to the scenarios (after the explanation?) to give context.

I don't think it was geared towards nursing as much as it should have been

I found the test a bit confusing in the correct most answers

I would like a lot less Florida-specific content and the course would benefit from better editing of spelling and grammatical errors.

Last lecture was best, but should be updated as it conflicted with info from an earlier lecture Some lectures appear to be promoting new therapies for niche issues not seen by most docs, e.g. pruritis in dialysis patients. Would like lectures that might improve care, such as evaluation +/- treatment of common issues such as skin cancer, chest pain, syncope, cough, fever, etc.

A bit long and confusing. Thank you, though, for a comprehensive course.

It was educational but the test I feel was focused more on names and numbers in place of the information on the topic.

Test depends more on bland facts that actual issue maybe have a few patient cases

Simple and concise, I don't think questions about what dates when something started are that relevant to the concept and application.

On the second half of Ethics and Boundaries, the test questions 2, 15, 16 were not applicable to what was covered. Question 2 was a T/F but it was not a question, it just restated the last option to question 1 ("Consultation with others, review of tx plan, implications of the dx) - so I'm not sure what the question was supposed to be. Also questions 15 and 16 were about a case concerning a "lonely lady" with people by the names of John and Marcy involved. I did not read such a case in the material you provided. Hope you able to correct these issues for others that will be taking it.

The case numbers are not listed correctly and questions #2, #15, #16, #19, and one other that says Case ^ is Charming and Alarming when it is actually Case 5. Supportive Therapy for a Lonely Lady was not there to read and I had to guess at # 15 and #16 questions.

Overall the course was easy to follow. It a lot of information to take in at times.

Good - I wish some key points were bolded or animated so that I could skim over the the words a bit.

It was informative, concise, good format and met my needs for required continued ed.

website easy to navigate, information was easy to understand and apply to practice