Verified review
Poorly written and the test was imprecise and inconsistent in its language also. Doesn't seem like a human generated this course.
923,281 ratings from learners across every course we offer, the low scores included. If you are wondering whether AchieveCE is legit, this page is the honest answer: real healthcare professionals telling you about their CE/CME experience.
Fast – Accredited, Affordable, and On-Demand
Every review comes from a licensed professional who completed a course and was awarded credit.
Poorly written and the test was imprecise and inconsistent in its language also. Doesn't seem like a human generated this course.
Very old data and subject matter way out of my scope of practice. Too much time spent on drugs and drugs combos for HIV treatment. I am not doing any of that as a Unit Secretary/CNA.
split up the courses so only what is needed can be completed
TMB should seriously reconsider asking pathologist to get CME on prescribing anything
There were several errors in the information and some of the questions were ambiguous. One error involved converting % to mg, drug class of propofol it said that dexmedetomidine blocked alpha receptors. Also, succinylcholine would not be used in procedural sedation. Also, I don’t think anyone can obtain chloral hydrate . Not sure if they even manufacture it anymore.
There should be a save feature added as I lost my responses and had to start over repeatedly
I did not see all of the answers in the reading material and was not sure if I could go back to reread...this was very frustrating...
I personally do not agree with the modern outlook on suicidality. I have been a therapist for over 20 years and the fact is, the more you think you know about it, the higher the suicide rates are going. It flies in the face of what we are being taught. So I take all of this with a grain of salt. I also didn't care for the insulting tone regarding religion. It's offensive!.
Boring and too much on assistants in test, I don't keep up on what they can and cannot do only what RDH can.
Information read as if it was thrown together with a mix of old and new information thrown in.
This information was mostly out of date. This would be a great course if there were updated information in it.
The test is too long (60 questions). They don't give you enough time to complete it. I had to retake the test three times.
Your CPR Training is outdated. Please update to the 2025 Standards - Please!
Forced to take courses I didn't need to finish the bundle. Bundle only provided 4CEU's toward what I needed to complete licensure requirements. Better to just take individual courses than do a bundle
questions with typos in answer, repetitive, not a good use of funds
If this actually counts towards credit then i like it But i dont know yet because your website has no link from what i need to what i am missing.
Boring also it made me take courses i did not need this cycle.
The course fills the AOA requirement of paying them money for CME
This exam. Was downright. Cruel. 1. The case studies/vignettes page were not only ridiculously unnecessarily long with way more detail than needed (for 2 questions each?!) But the formatting was an absolute nightmare, ESPECIALLY FOR SOMEONE WITH ADHD, CAN YOU AT LEAST PUT PARAGRAPH SPACING IN THEM?!!? And to put ALL 9 VIGNETTES on one page-- you have to go back and forth, i had to copy and paste them to reference them. It would run so much more smoothly if you asked the case specific questions after the case study, not all at the end with questions for everuthing else? The other questions didn't feel like it tested my knowledge of ethics at all-- it tested working memory, reading comprehension, and research. Clinicians never need to know codes of ethics for professions they're not licensed in, there's so much overlap, so to take this as a counselor and be asked about MFT, psychologists and social workers specific literature on ethics is compltely unhelpful and unnecessary. And FINALLY: SOMETHING NEEDS TO BE DONE ABOUT THE TIMING FOR THESE TESTS AND THE FORMATTING. I SLAVED OVER THIS EXAM. BROUGHT ME TO TEARS BECAUSE IT WAS SO POORLY AND AMBIGUOUSLY WRITTEN-- BUT SOMEHOW EVEN WORSE, IT TIMES OUT ON YOU WHEN YOU'RE TRYING TO DO A GOOD JOB AND ERASES ALL OF YOUR ANSWERS. I HAD TO MAKE A COPY JUST OF THE ANSWERS TO GET THIS IN IN THE TIME FRAME. AND HAD TO ESSENTIALLY RE-TAKE THE EXAM BECAUSE OF IT. I never say this but i confidently will here: Whoever decided the formatting of vignettes and exam, and honestly maybe even the test question writers-- should be fired.
Superficial, sterile, scripted. A human did not contribute to this course enough to make it speak to actual humans. More geared toward AI robot doctor giving the data to other robot doctors who then disseminate to nameless robot patients.
I don't know why I didn't get any credits for this class
The newest, chronologically, information is from one article in 2020. You need to update your information.
Too much reading, needs to be interactive and provide answers to questions.
The test was horrible. Many of the questions were confusing and poorly written (example Question 1)