What AchieveCE learners are saying

Terrible. Poorly written. Very dumbed down. All the information can be found easily through a google search and would fill maybe one page. I expect better from a professional continuing education course.

It seemed vaguely related to Massage Therapy. It basically describes a system aimed at really making medical professionals wrong in any way possible, under the guise of "trying to improve". Charts, graphs, or the likes would have made this more palatable. But, for $15, I guess one can't complain too much. Thankfully, one could go back and forth from the text to the test from the same web page, without losing their progress in the test.

I wish there was some other forms of learning included in the program besides just reading. Pictures and maybe video or audio would make it more interesting and bearable to get through.

Atrocious. Written by a non-English speaker. Errors in quiz. Says Hemoglobin test instead of H1C. Useless for anything but meeting CE requirements.

Way too easy. Zero drug calcs; limited information... I could go on and on.

This class was great for a basic EMT. But if you are a Paramedic or even an advanced it is more of a check the box not an educational experience. This class was like reading a virtual textbook and did not interact with the student through use of videos or alternate media formats. I am truly disappointed that this is all Florida requires of their Paramedics.

cannot complete because they say I have not answered i question. help me. already paid , passed with 80% correct

I only needed to take 24 units, and yet, your package forced me to take All 30 ceus!  Awful. Secondly, most other packages i have ever bought, allowed me to choose what topics  of dozens offered, to complete for my "general" ceus. Your company did not do that.    but worst of all,  some of the courses did not use proper english, there were words like "the" and "when" were  missing.  Carelessness. but even worse than that, were some facts and answers were WRONG. See screenshot  of your program asking what is the main cause of type 2 diabetes?  Even google knows, the main cause of type 2 diabetes is Eating too much, Yet, your programmers think diabetes 2 is caused by "drinking" too much.  That section of testing did Not use good english, so possibly, they meant to ask what is a main SYMPTOM of diabetes type 2?  which would be excessive thirst/drinking too much. but that is NOT what they asked.  They ask what is main CAUSE Of diabetes type 2. Also, there is zero wrong with a man having a 37 inch waistline, that is NOT a symptom of any metabolic disorder,  Unless he is super short guy? Tall men who are fit and athletic often have 37 inch waistlines, is fine.  Maybe the person who wrote That question is 5 feet tall? yet, a fasting sugar of 105 IS a symptom of potential metabolic disorder.  so that is wrong, too.  WHO IS WRITING YOUR TESTS?  Very short Student nurses? Antoher confusing question is on human trafficking, you give conflicting info on whether the person who wrote the test thinks abducting the victim is, or is not,, commonly done in trafficking.  The test gives conflicting info, unless you do not see "abduction" to be the same as "kidnapping".   Your test rewards one answer for saying kidnapping is NOT part of trafficking yet says abducting IS part of trafficking. WHICH IS IT?  Make up your minds.  Stop drinking tequila while you type up your tests for pete's sake.   Some of the obscure focuses of the questions were useless bits of trivia not helpful info to focus on.  Especially as seen in the medications for AIDS info, way too too many questions focused on detailed meds that ONLY a nurse treating Aids patients needs to know, and useless to the rest of us.  Waste of time, when there IS so much you "could have" tried to teach us about Aids today.  Who cares what classification of detailed meds this or that is?  That is NOT applicable to 90% of us nurses out here, but how to help prevent infections and safe sexual practices by aids patients Would have been useful to know. There was a lot of nonsense in your tests.

There are 2 typos in test section that will result in wrong answers

This was a waste of money. There were errors in either the spelling or wording of multiple questions and answers. It seems very low-budget and non-professional. I will not utilize this resource in the future nor will I recommend it to colleagues.

Lots Problems Here. No course material. Table of Contents and Case Study I and II; On to the test and feedback section. I would like to talk to someone about this. Please read notes in feedback section, last question asked. Not Happy. Thank you.

My renewal date is March 31, 2021 so I do not understand why it says "course completion date outside renewal period"

See my comments on eval. Rediculous length and details of HIV course. Could not choose courses I needed.

Please keep social justice issues out of training that should be evidence-based.

Poor knowledge of the History and Evolution of Occupational Therapy. Good on the FL law statutes.

organized with good level of detail but bland and boring in its delivery of information - not interactive, no images..

Outdated and mostly irrelevant for anyone who wants to stay up to date on Telemedicine. Most of the sources cited are from 2009-2015. Very disappointed and a waste of time.

The rules of informed consent invoving testing were not specified at all in the training material. It only stated that there were anonymous testing sites available. Far to much emphasis was put on drugs and there actions in the questions and not nearly enough was put on the prevelance, education, and possible symptoms of drug reactions I should be looking out for in my HIV/AIDS patients. Im not sure who your intended audience was, but hopefully pharamacists and DR who treat people with HIV/AIDS already understand the mechanisms for the drugs they prescribe and why they are doing it, it would be scary if they are depending on this training, and to the rest of us this is immaterial. I know this was only 12 dollars, so Im not expecting miracles but the questions were not very well thought out nor did a passing score demonstrate any kind of real mastery of the material.

The material was well presented but no, I didn't love it. It's a dry and boring topic.

Quite a few errors with the wording on the exams. Also it was not advertised that you have to complete the entire package in order to earn your credit hours. I will not be purchasing this package ever again.

You should not have to finish the all courses before get CE for on section or topic.

The questions were not difficult but the reading is not clear and precise.

It was very hard to find the answers to the questions. Most questions I answered based on my knowledge as an OT. The first question did not have the correct answer as all of the services mentioned can be provided by an OT.

Just know this course is all text. There are some spelling errors, and it's purely 'read and click through'. Great price, but I expected more multi-media.