What AchieveCE learners are saying

Information is from 2005 - 2007 (stats) and information in article contradicts test answers.

The wording throughout the course was unnecessarily technical, making the material more difficult to read and understand. Simplifying the language and reducing jargon would have made the content more accessible and engaging.

The title makes it sound like ethics broadly for all states and licensures; however, the test feels pretty specific to Florida providers. I probably would have chosen a different course if the title was more specific as I am not practicing in Florida.

a learning experience should allow the partaker to review a test to learn what was not learned.

Should be a course for a non-mental health professional to provide an overview.

Couldn't claim partial CME without finishing entire course. Issues with things being relevant to my state or out of date. Editing could be better, in some places filler text remained in the lesson.

Succinct and to the point. Information on medical errors as they pertain to the field of massage therapy would be more interesting.

AAMFT code of ethics has been updated since the code this course referenced (2015) AND quiz timed out on me during first attempt which is a technical issue I've seen reported by other participants and very much needs to be addressed.

The article was blurry. Seemed to be more speculation than facts. Not enough information and not enough correlations to DSM.

The content was repetitive and vague. More clinical vignettes would have been helpful

its informative but would live further assistance on working with ASD as a mental health professional

the test question can be extremely focused in details and some test are up to 40 questions long, thanks for your consideration

expected a video from a doctor ,not a text to self read

Good information but a lot of reading. The course could use PowerPoint slides, visuals, and/or audio options. The quiz at the end also used overly formal verbiage; the same point can be reached with simplified language.

it was merely an overview of the AUD treatment literature with no actual treatment protocol content. The most disappointing aspect of the training was the test itself. offhand I would say that a full third of the test questions were extraneous to the material presented in the course and seemed pulled from an entirely different course, one that was meant for nurses.

It was not at all what I expected. Need more on the topic of how to generate clinical notes and evaluations.

Heavy on pharm, some courses out of date. Should be able to get credit for individual courses completed without having to take them all.

would be much better if videos and power points were involved..not just scrolling and reading...

Would have liked more detail about working with Autism as an LPC

A handful of poorly written questions in the exam with confusing answer choices

Too long and information was all over the place and didn't match Q&A easily

The courses were not a consistent level of work. Some had spelling errors and one of the tests had incorrect answers.

I had to do it. It wasn't the worst thing in the world.

I feel that this course could have been better{grammatical errors} and it was not always easy to navigate.