What AchieveCE learners are saying

ergonomics questions were hard to understand. double negatives make it confusing. Marijuana questions were unusually specific and detailed.

The amount of typos, grammatical errors, and incorrect wording was very distracting and discouraging

Again took too long for only 1 CEU but the question I got wrong did not concur with the information provided or information that can be found from trustworthy sources.

It was a bunch of reading. It would be more fun if they added hands on portions so we add some more moves under our belt.

It went over each discipline separately although they are nearly identical. Better to cover the identical rules then point out where they differ. Less dry and confusing.

Some of the data was inaccurate and the writing of the questions needs work

I had a lot of problems with stopping and restarting the program causing me to take tests multiple times.

Good info, but needs to be undated. Course said there are no Coronavirus immunizations.

It was not bad I have all ready been a CNA just had to do this to get my license back since it’s been a little bit. But some of the stuff you have us learn on here does not pertain to being a CNA

Several courses were very lengthy and filled with statistics making it difficult to process the information

Would love more pictures of loral lesions to help aid in the learning

Took longer than expected and I rarely prescribe narcotics . None within the past three years

This course had great information about strokes but had almost no information about PT intervention which is what I was hoping for.

The Mandatory Articles were good. The 18 hrs of learning were repeats from the 30 hr package that I had done Jan. 2025. I would suggest changing the Cannabis, and SPH articles.

I am an auditory learner and have vision issues so this format is difficult for me. Should be accommodations for people like me.

The differential diagnosis section was great but the treatment section for strengthening and stretching exercises was lacking.

Not giving quality at all, feels like spreading stigma rather than suport

Some material too technical, some too old. Easy to take, test questions phrased well.

It is a lot of reading, however, the material is valuable and applicable!

I think the answer to the second question in the pretest is wrong. As is #14 in the test.

I especially liked the ability to take the course over multiple days.

Very informative but too in-depth for 3 hours credit. Should be 5-6 cme hours.

Considering that it is a professional site, there were a significant amount of misspellings and errors that including missing answers... Below are examples: [24.2] Test: Rheumatoid Arthritis and Cardiovascular Risk Considerations **Q 1 doesnt specify if the pt is a smoker. Also has misspellings (ESR instead GFR) which the website was asking for GFR... makes it difficult to calculate ASCVD. One question had "bupropion/naloxone" as the correct answer when it should have been buprenorphine/naloxone for opioid dependency/abuse.. Some questions were missing the correct answer (only had A,B,C options but D was missing), forcing me to get it wrong. [24.2] Test: Rheumatoid Arthritis and Cardiovascular Risk Considerations 6) states :”Which of the following statements is NOT Which of the following is recommended as a next step in the care of Harold?” This makes no sense and is confusing for the reader.. Someone should review this test and correct the errors as this affects the customer who paid for the course.

You have to take/pass all sections in order to pass the course.