What AchieveCE learners are saying

confusing questions the way they were phrased. the course information was excellent

Good course, not much has changed over the last 6 or 7 times I have had to take similar courses. Would be nice to just take the assessment and only be referred back to the material if performing inadequately on the assessment.

Well organized, but material is very dry. Test questions were good examples.

There is a question on this exam that is a true/false question however the 2 answers say "true or true". Since there was only the option to select true, thats what I selected and I got the question wrong. This needs to be updated to have "true or false" answers.

The course achieved its purpose and was not too lengthy and or wordy.

References seemed to be old, wondering how old the course is and if more recent data is available.

I enjoyed how convenient this course was to take. It was well written and stayed on topic

With studies and statistics from as far back as 2009 and 2014, the information is outdated.

Maybe add some visual aid, photos, graphs just to break the blandness of simple black text on white background.

Some of the answers on the test are not clear in the article

Easy to maneuver and get through. Appreciate the bundle of needed requirements.

Directed for pharmacists mostly, not social workers. Although, I did enjoy all the medicine information, but not related to my scope of practice.

Really good refresher and was able to get the credits I needed at once.

Weird that most of the content was Florida despite the package being titled and marketed to Ohio practitioners

It was a god course and I liked doing it at my own pace.

There were a couple of questions with duplicate answers that caused me to score lower than needed. Proofreading would fix that.

I wish it was a video so I could listen to it verses reading it. However, great information

Could be improved with some advanced topic such as VQ mismatch and emergent airways.

Good info but boring format. Would like videos or more interactive format

I understand the reasoning behind this, but I found myself trying to figure out if there were trick questions re: dental assistants vs. registered dental assistants.

Most of what was in the course was what I have heard before.

Overall, the course met my needs and presented interesting topics. Grammar was shoddy, some passages are duplicated, some phrasessareruntogether (like that) in more than one course, the DSM IV (or terms from IV) were in two of the presentations (we are now on DSM V), and the test for older-person sexuality contains answers not found in the actual text (I passed that by process of elimination after several tries). Otherwise, it was all good.

Good overall, a bit outdated in some trainings but it was still good and helpful information

Some actual answers are incorrect and some questions only alloow one answer when teh quewstion actually asks for all that apply.