What AchieveCE learners are saying

The course material was incomplete. There were several areas where statistics or examples were supposed to be listed, but there was only a citation. Most people are not going to take the time to look this information up to complete a CE requirement. Some of this missing information was referenced in the test, which led to guessing and incorrect answers.

The questions are about 85% medications and not truly patient care treatments. You can retake the tests as many times as needed until you pass them to move on, so that was nice.

Very repetitive and osteopathy focused. Principles of medical error were adequately explained.

Way too wordy, alloting 2 hrs credit for the volume of reading is insulting to our time.

I think the courses questions order could have been better maybe 25 or 50 qeustion at a time.

This course was geared more to pharmaceutical. Plus it was not accurate regarding the vitamins. Old date. Need to update to methylation and methyl folate instead of folic acid.

When I searched for courses that would satisfy the State license renewal, this came up. At no point in the description or through checkout did it mention that the course was focused for Osteopathic providers. As an allopathic medical doctor, large parts of context are irrelevant to my practice. Additionally, I would suggest that medical errors are not specific to osteopathic/allopathic medicine. Disappointing course with poor description of content and illogical focus on osteopathic context to preventing medical errors.

The course is labeled "Who do you think you are... which led me to believe I was going to get to learn about [ersonality types described by Robert Rohm in "Who Do You Think You Are (Anyway)?". Also, the test course work said I would get access to HPILS Inventory. But here we are at the end of the course and it doesn't appear to be included.

The course was very osteopathic heavy. It does not pertain to MDs

The entire course is outdated and not helpful in 2025. Most of the modules are still exactly the same for when I completed these courses in 2023.

The material contained great information and seemed well-researched, but the writing was quite sterile and difficult to engage with.

The course should be made up of engaging videos, not just boring text.

Why do I have to email someone to submit my CE credits...

the IUD section was out of date, Mirena and Liletta are good for 8 years

This course took me exactly 11 minutes to complete. :) I did not come away from this course with any knowledge that will improve my clinical skills. I would have appreciated a more in-depth analysis of the topic, rather than just common sense tactics (ex. speak in simple sentences).

questions and answers are worded poorly. very confusing. and question 19 has a typo

The information was solid, but it read like a WebMD-type article. It was below expectations for my clinical needs, though the information itself was acceptable.

The texts are uneven, the reading is often way too dry and the tests are, at times, too unclear with answers that do not go to the text specifically but request inferences that are simply not discernable

These mandatory courses really need audio and visual features, they are extremely boring. There needs to be more effort into the preparation of these courses.

Material is not updated, written poorly, explained poorly, needs a total revamping to be current with today’s standards.

I already did tell you...TWICE, the first time it wiped out my input and the 2nd time, it changed my score and then seems to have changed it again [95%, 100%, and now, by this page's input, a 98% pass rate on this course. Your system is really skewed. Course text too long, poorly formatted, covered material not relevant to my role, state, or function. Other than the ethics CEUs, I consider this to have been a near total waste of time and that's so sad, since ethics are hugely important to me.

I live in Texas so Florida law and their board of ethics was largely irrelevant

expand cultural diversity education- this was strongly focused on LGBTQ which is appropriate as an aspect of cultural education but the scope should be broader.

I honestly received a 100% the answers it says I chose were not at all what I marked