What AchieveCE learners are saying

I was fully expecting this course ot be more tailored to the mental health population since it was suggested to me as a mental health therapist when I did the search for CE's

In so many years of existence of this field there is absolutely no mentioning of role of spirituality in human development. This limits each and every area covered in this course.

some mistakes in the questions, some repeated information verbatim. A bit boring. Ok got the job done.

Not really geared towards nursing in my opinion. Seemed more helpful for pharmacists or prescribing providers.

Too much information on alternative therapies to then report most of them as barely effective

I think it is wrong to LMHC to have to work with medical errors 95% of the required material is not applicable for the LMHC field. I want to be clear the test was fine but it is a wrong requirement from the state.

I did not care for all the pharmacology, would much rather have practical information

Most of the sources cited are from over a decade ago, and no source was cited from the last few years. It would be nice to see updates as technology has changed significantly.

The quizzes need to be updated. The first references Florida statutes that are not discussed. The 2nd quiz references a case study that doesn't exist, mislabels others, and question #2 is incomplete.

OVERALL AVERAGE BUT COULD IMPROVE BY BEING MORE PERTINENT TO MY DISCIPLINE

THE TEST QUESTION WERE REASONABLE EXCEPT FOR ASKING FOR DATES DOES NOT HELP ME IN NURSING

It is very difficult to read 9 cases and then answer questions about them many minutes later. It would be more beneficial if the case was presented and then the questions are below so you could reference them. Honestly, I forgot which case was which so had no idea the answers. Very frustrating.

It is out-of-date. It still calls TJC by its very old name JCAHCO. It is very clear you do not update your curriculum.

Felt pharm heavy but overall ok. Felt like this was less nurse related and pharmacist relevant

average. The presentation of studies to support treatment recommendations for specific painful conditions was complicated and confusing.

the material was good but the test is ridiculous and even has errors in it. the questions were mostly about VERY dated research and focused on peoples names rather than the study subject.. truly the weirdest test!

It was convenient having all the required courses, but it was a lot of information a t once. It was a little overwhelming. I am a visual and auditory learner so i struggled to get through the training,

The audio didn’t work on the phone or on my computer or on the laptop

The language and sentence structure in this course was very confusing and dense.

It’s a repetitive instruction. I don’t know that there is a way to making it interesting to those who have seen the same type of presentation dozens of times.

Seemed to be directed more towards the pharmacy profession and not nursing. And one of the survey questions asked for a NABP number,which is for pharmacy professionals. I was constantly checking the Course Package title to make sure it was for RNs. It was just very confusing.

Only one paragraph pertained to my field of expertise. I found the course too general and was not directed towards mental health.

For Part II Quis: Question 2 doesn’t make sense Question 3 has repeat answer choices Question 15 and 16 reference the wrong case study/case study not included in course

One of the test questions did not correspond to the choices in answering.