What AchieveCE learners are saying

Limiting opioid therapy to the highest effective dose for each patient. Obvious Mistake In the Assessment

Softball questions, repeated questions l, and irrelevant questions made up the majority of all the tests. I feel like I could’ve not read a word and still passed…

Waste of time. Most info is irrelevant for day to day business

self explanatory for the most part, just another way to get a couple bucks from us. Ironic how we have to do "continued education" more hours and pay again for more education but barber board lowers required hours by almost half for new licenses. (1800 to now 1000)

I am 61 yrs old about to retire and this was hell for me my ptsd is off the hook and caused great anxiety.

All courses are ARTICLES. I expected videos. Information felt outdated. There were articles cited from 1977, the 80s, and 90s, and early 2000s. I find that inappropriate and outdated in medicine. Lots of typos throughout. Some quiz questions were just straight up wrong and no way to notify the course writers.

We shouldn't have to do these anyway, it's better than forcing us to play video for 3 hours but I was able to answer the questions from memory from my barber training. I don't need the refresher, state board, and I shouldn't be forced to pay for one. I actually did a $1400 educational course this year for hairstylists but that of course doesn't qualify for CE hours lol. Also there are typos in some of the questions! So we are paying for something that hasn't even been professionally edited. Stupid.

This ce stuff is beyond stupid and just a money grab put on by the barber board of Ohio

muy bueno.nota:eso de pobre yo no lo escribi y no se borra .

This was not enjoyable, most of the material was inaccurate and out of date. Most of it more applicable to the UK than the US. All in all a very poor excuse for continuing education program for healthcare.

this show\uld not be in the Nursing home package if it cannot be counted in the trasnscript

The tests in this bundle were more in tune with a pharmacology degree, not a registered nurse. I believe the classes were not in the correct bundle.

Unclear questions, many grammatical errors, just copied studies and not intentionally prepared educational material. Choose another one!

I experienced the test changing my answers to incorrect answers on several tests. To prove it, on one test, I videoed with my phone of my answers before pushing the "next" button then screenshot the answer that got changed to a wrong answer. Thus, my completion score should have been much higher! This happened on several tests but unfortunately I didn't think about recording it until almost at the end of the course!

It's ridiculous that you have to take all courses even when not required!!!!

Tedious coursework! Basically 200+ pages of black and white text void of tables, charts, pictures or diagrams that might have helped to organize the material or at least, made it interesting.

I would not recommend this course. Some material was very outdated. some was not really pertinent to me as a nurse (example -esthetician course). I have historically been able to use my nursing CEUs for my CPHQ CEU requirements but do not think some of these will be usable.

THERE IS NO REVERSAL AGENT FOR SUCCINYLCHOLINE, YOU DONT GIVE NEOSTIGMINE TO REVERSE SUCCINYLCHOLINE NO ANESTHESIA PROVIDER WOULD DO THIS, SUCCINYLCHOLINE IS SELF LIMITING . This is the sole reason I give this course a D minus

The courses were geared toward pharmacology. These courses were not necessarily toward helping a nurse practitioner become up to date with practice guidelines, patient demographics, ethics, or practice barriers.

If you MAKE me rate a course, you are getting the lowest score I can give

The final exam in the course listed 9 case studies when there were only 3 in the actual course. Therefore, I had to guess what some of these case studies even were about in order to pass the exam.

This course is on a relevant topic but needs work. There was information missing that I had to google in an attempt to get through the questions at the end of part one. It was also missing an entire case study, leaving you to guess on the answers related to that case study and relying on the title of each case study not the number to know which one to reference.

Already wrote why this course was so disappointing on previous page and how question 1 is a loaded question and the why is also explained on previous p[age

It was not well done and having to do this as a licensing requirement is stupid. Most of this lesson doesn’t even apply to my job.