What AchieveCE learners are saying

It was tedious, however, highly informative. It is better suited for psychological professionals rather than counseling professionals.

i don't understand why there was so much focus on DO practice

Course : one part was a video portion , very long Second : infection and control long and textbook no video Higoy recommend video portions for each exam

Interactive in that it had quiz segments, but these were interspersed with long textual segments. Would prefer more bullet point format for the textual segments.

The course and course exam have a lot of detailed information, so if you are looking for fan abundance of information from many disciplines codes of ethics, this course is for you. If you only want NASW info, this is not the course you want to take.

The questions have a glitch or something went wrong, that some answers came out wrong but they were actually right.

I found some of the course tests had errors in the ability to answer the correct answer.

It was an easy read which I liked. I just thought it would go into more depth. Talk about how grinding/clenching causes sensitive teeth or recommend products that I could recommend to my patients.

I notice some of the courses have expired which has me concerned that I will be able to use these for renewal

Course is a little dated in the information presented as there is now a vaccine available.

Hard to pay attention to an hour-long video. Much rather prefer written material.

It was not clear this was an osteopathic focused course. There was a lot of acronyms used I am unfamiliar with and made it difficult to answer questions accurately.

Alot of typos even one spot that said "fill in more information here". HIV section quiz too in depth that doesnt translate to real world application.

I did not understand the content would be aimed at DO. I am an MD and the material often referred to abbreviations that DO's use commonly and that I had to guess what they meant. I also did not like the software for this course making me go back and start over every time I had to take a break. I was really disappointed when I sat for 90min and got through the test, and the system said I took too much time and erased all my answers so I had to take the test over. BTW, I only missed 1 and I had it right the first time but was in a hurry having to go through it again and I had to go to the BR but was afraid, they would make me start over again!!!!

It was a good introduction. I will look for something more in-depth. I liked the format a lot.

Questions were vague and I overthought them, which may be a reflection of my personaity.

Took this as a RN, but the course was focused more on pharmacist CE and not nursing.

Outdated information and dead links in multiple course modules as of December 2025.

Dense amount of info. Audio would help, Course not timing out (not telling you it's time out till you answer test would help). Otherwise good. Thanks

Slides with pictures/graphs/charts to break up the mundane reading would have been great

It is too heavily focused on pharmacology. There needs to be more of a focus on anatomy, diagnoses, and nursing procedures.

Too long. took me far more than 2 hours and was redundant in certain areas

do not take if not a DO, totally focused on DO specific things

Learned a little. This is literally just reading text off a screen. Had no idea there were no visuals or even sound. Very different from earlier re-certification times! Ironically, I used my laptop's adaptive tech to screen read this aloud, which helps make it slightly more interesting.