What AchieveCE learners are saying

They had extra things that weren’t necessary for licensure and a lot of information that was geared towards first time nurses not those in practice

very boring. the weed class way to over the top. need to dumb it down for nurses

Pretty basic information and not up to date. Also not super relevant to my practice. Course was easy to navigate and did not take that long.

I only needed certain courses but had to do all of them. I wasn't aware of that when I purchased this

You need to have an audio version of the lessons instead of having to read through the whole thing. Very dry material. I am more or an auditory learner, and not even having an option to listen to the lessons was very disappointing.

We should not have to do all of these to renew our license, it is a huge waste of time and our money. I think having to pay to make sure I can continue working as a nurse is a silly concept.

Too much information on each screen. Break it up more for better absorption

The course needs updating on government regulations on quarantine during pandemics, such as Covid-19.

An question/answer is marked wrong. These should be reviewed regularly and corrected!

I did not like the requirement to complete every section before receiving my certificate which was not noted anywhere when purchasing the package.

The website was extremely difficult to navigate. There was no way to go back-and-forth between the tests to double check answers. And it kicked you off if you idle more than 10 minutes. All in all a less than positive experience.

It's pretty hard to get through pages and pages of only text, and while some of the material was well-written (I thought the impairment course and the human trafficking course were very well-written by people who definitely cared about what they were writing), some of the courses were clearly copied and pasted from somewhere else, or had the same lines of text repeating multiple times, or otherwise were clearly put together by someone in a rush or that just wasn't interested in the subject. And sometimes the questions on the tests were about things that truly don't matter at all to actual day-to-day nursing (like asking in what year a law was passed).

The course was fair. The information was hit or miss. Attempts at trickiness were boring and time consuming.

Too long. Too many vignettes to read at the end of the course and on the test.

The program would not safe my progress, i had to redo it all over twice.

I prefer more of vides and audio rather than reading the content myself. It does not help with people who have different learning styles.

Poor presentation of course material and test design - there were several issues with information missing in course material that was then presented in the tests. Some of the courses were predominantly reading through copy and pasted research studies without much teaching material added to help practitioners improve their work with clients.

Information was good however the information provided didn't align with the questions asked on the test.

adverse effects of vaccines have not been ruled out as a possible contributing factor in the asd dx. If you have substantial evidence of the contrary, it would be helpful to include that information in you publication.

Florid required topics were very good and pertinent. Pharmacology topics, to me were biased toward using a more expensive option to treat pharmacologically then less expensive treatment options. Also, it would have been VERY helpful if zero copay of free drugs were presented. Thank you

Some questions on the exam were not covered in the provided reading material

Only took about twenty tries and useless "conversation" with AI generated help until it finally got unstuck!

This course didn't seem to meet my needs as a social work CEU as this presentation was created for pharmacists. I was very interested in how to have conversations with clients regarding cannabis use, including risk factors and harm reduction. However, this course was focused on a lot of medical terminology that was not given much explanation, as again, this was intended for pharmacists. I did enjoy some of the US based statistics.

It was way too lengthy without clear summaries for such detailed information on laws and statutes.