What AchieveCE learners are saying

I would not recommend this specific course for nursing license renewal. It seems to be geared more towards Pharmacists and Pharmacy Techs.

An interactive component would have really helped explain some of the components.

The information in and of itself was quite thorough and well put together, aside from some occasional spelling and formatting errors. The tests, however, often marked answers incorrect that should have otherwise been correct, as such I believe that those are in need to review and fixing.

Please review the course material and correct grammatical errors as well as answers that were marked correctly by me were reported as incorrect after going back and checking the course material.

The exam was more about recalling unimportant numbers from studies than practical information used for patient care. Good content, though.

The course material was okay, but some of the test questions need to be revised to be more clearly understood.

some questions were not clear (regarding patient MM). i found this stressfull/frustrating.

Way too long in some modules like cannabis and SPH. The video's were hard to follow. Way too much information on cannibas video.

overall I felt there were too many videos, I prefer some self study and to read some of the information or to be able to skip ahead for those individuals that just read from a slide or talked slow. This was a nursing CEU course and it was overly pharmacy heavy and many of the lessons were directed more to pharmacy related individuals. The material was dated to 2020-2022; would have liked to have more relevant data for 2024.

Information appears to be a little outdated. There are much more research out there that could be utilized in this course.

Several of the modules seemed more appropriate for a pharmacist or doctor and not a nurse. Alot of the medication modules were not super useful for me in practice as I am not prescribing medications

Question nine marked as wrong. However, I did not answer the question as it states. This glitch needs to be fixed. I noticed another review stated such, however, decided to take course anyway. I needed these credit hours. Please take note of this. thanks, Anna C.

Ease of use was a plus but references were old and needed to be updated.

Too much detail for those of us that don’t actually treat pain or prescribe opioids, just need the CME credit for state licensing requirements

While the information in this course was useful, it was primarily geared to Pharmacists.

Everything good except too many fast talking pharmacist presenters who use unfamiliar acronyms. Good bit of info seemed more geared to Pharmacists over nurses. The other info was good tho.

Thought this would be a bit more in depth than the other tinnitus course.

Too difficult and the answer for the question on mild psychosis was wrong.

there is a lot of unnecessary information in this course, especially for physicians that NEVER prescribe narcotics and do NOT manage pain. there are specialist for that.

Not of a fan of the video learning style. I prefer reading the education.

Better if correct answers were given during 1st try if the tests

Most of have technical issues with scoring; some that were marked incorrect was not the answer I choose.

Some of the pharmacology information seemed more appropriate for health care professionals prescribing medications

Some courses were good. The ethics course was dry and not very interesting